casino slots download free Sam Altman-led OpenAI targets 1 billion users by 2025 on the back of Apple partnership

Bath & Body Works Inc. stock outperforms competitors on strong trading day, and now it’s added another victim to the list: Suggested actions has been deprecated in Windows 11. “Suggested actions that appear when you copy a phone number or future date in Windows 11 are deprecated and will be removed in a future Windows 11 update,” in a new update. Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday — get free copies of Paul Thurrott's Windows 11 and Windows 10 Field Guides (normally $9.99) as a special welcome gift! I wouldn’t be surprised if you’re unfamiliar with Suggested actions, as this feature is quite limited and very well hidden. But I cover it in of the , which I guess I’ll need to update now. Suggested actions was limited in scope since its inception and it’s never been improved or updated, so I guess I’m not surprised it’s disappearing. “Windows 11 includes an obscure feature called Suggested actions that appears when you copy a date, time, or phone number to the Clipboard and suggests relevant actions,” . “For example, if you copy a date or time to the Clipboard, the Suggested action pop-up provides one or more ‘Create event’ options so you can do so using a compatible app on your PC ... And if you copy a phone number to the Clipboard, the Suggested action pop-up provides one or more ‘Call number’ options so you can do that using a compatible app on your PC.” Suggested actions joins a long list of features Microsoft deprecated in or removed from Windows this year, including , Paint 3D, Adobe Type 1 fonts, DirectAccess, NTLM, Driver Verifier GUI, passwords in Multiple Provider Router (MPR) system notifications, certificates using RSA keys with key lengths shorter than 2048 bits, and Test Base for Microsoft 365. Paul Thurrott is an award-winning technology journalist and blogger with 30 years of industry experience and the author of 30 books. He is the owner of and the host of three tech podcasts: with Leo Laporte and Richard Campbell, , and with Brad Sams. He was formerly the senior technology analyst at Windows IT Pro and the creator of the SuperSite for Windows from 1999 to 2014 and the Major Domo of Thurrott.com while at BWW Media Group from 2015 to 2023. You can reach Paul via , or . Join the crowd where the love of tech is real - become a Thurrott Premium Member today! Sign up for our new free newsletter to get three time-saving tips each Friday

As we age, our cognitive and motor functions degrade, reducing our independence and overall quality of life. Research efforts to mitigate or perhaps eliminate this have resulted in technologies that hold a lot of promise. Now, scientists led by Friedhelm Hummel at EPFL have identified an important factor affecting an individual’s responsiveness to atDCS. The team looked at how native learning abilities determine the effect of brain stimulation applied while learning a motor task. Their findings suggest that individuals with less efficient learning mechanisms benefit more from stimulation, while those with optimal learning strategies might experience negative effects. Among these is non-invasive brain stimulation: a term encompassing a set of techniques that can affect brain functions externally and noninvasively, without the need for surgery or implants. One such promising technique, in particular, is anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS), which uses a constant, low electrical current delivered via electrodes on the scalp to modulate neuronal activity. However, studies exploring atDCS have produced inconsistent results, which has prompted researchers to explore why some people benefit from atDCS while others don’t. The problem seems to lie in our understanding of factors that may influence responsiveness to brain stimulation, leading to responders and non-responders; among these, age has been suggested as one important factor. Some studies suggest further factors such as baseline behavioural abilities and previous training might be important considerations, but an interplay of these factors with behaviour has not been determined in detail, pointing to the need of refined predictive models of the effects of atDCS. The researchers recruited 40 participants: 20 middle-aged adults (50-65 years old) and 20 older adults (over 65). Each group was further divided into those receiving active atDCS and those receiving placebo stimulation. Over ten days, participants practised a finger-tapping task designed to study motor sequence learning at home while receiving atDCS. The task involved replicating a numerical sequence using a keypad, trying to be as fast and as accurate as possible. The team then used a machine-learning model trained on a public dataset to classify participants as either “optimal” or “suboptimal” learners, based on their initial performance. This model aimed to predict who would benefit from atDCS, based on their ability to integrate information about the task efficiently early during training. The study found that suboptimal learners, who were seemingly less efficient at internalizing the task at the early stages of learning, experienced an accelerated accuracy improvement while performing the task when receiving atDCS. This effect was not limited to people of a certain age (e.g., older adults), with suboptimal learners being found among younger individuals as well. In contrast, participants with optimal learning strategies, regardless of age, even showed a negative trend in performance when receiving atDCS. This difference suggests that brain stimulation is more beneficial for individuals who initially struggle with motor tasks. As such, atDCS seems to possess a restorative rather than an enhancing quality, with important implications for rehabilitation. “By leveraging different methods in Machine learning, we were able to untangle the influence of different factors on the individual effects of brain stimulation,” said Pablo Maceira, the study’s first author. “This will pave the way to maximize the effects of brain stimulation in individual subjects and patients.” The study implies that, in the long run, personalized brain stimulation protocols will be developed to maximize benefits based on an individual’s specific needs, rather than a common trait such as age. This approach could lead to more effective brain stimulation-based interventions, targeting specific mechanisms supporting learning, especially in the view of neurorehabilitation, for which the main basis is the re-learning of lost skills due to a brain lesion (e.g., after a stroke or a traumatic brain injury). “In the future, clinicians could apply a more advanced version of our algorithm to determine whether a patient will benefit from a brain stimulation-based therapy, to enhance the effects of neurorehabilitation and personalize treatment,” said Hummel. (With inputs from ANI)Correction: Election 2024-North Carolina-Governor story

The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company Buys 1,248 Shares of DocuSign, Inc. (NASDAQ:DOCU)Subsea7 awarded contract in the US Gulf of Mexico

The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company boosted its holdings in shares of DocuSign, Inc. ( NASDAQ:DOCU – Free Report ) by 2.4% during the 3rd quarter, Holdings Channel reports. The fund owned 53,508 shares of the company’s stock after buying an additional 1,248 shares during the period. The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company’s holdings in DocuSign were worth $3,322,000 as of its most recent SEC filing. Other hedge funds and other institutional investors have also recently modified their holdings of the company. Inspire Investing LLC purchased a new stake in shares of DocuSign during the 3rd quarter valued at $911,000. Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc. raised its stake in DocuSign by 1.2% in the third quarter. Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc. now owns 1,328,355 shares of the company’s stock valued at $82,478,000 after buying an additional 16,014 shares during the last quarter. International Assets Investment Management LLC boosted its holdings in DocuSign by 5,660.8% in the third quarter. International Assets Investment Management LLC now owns 438,914 shares of the company’s stock worth $27,252,000 after acquiring an additional 431,295 shares in the last quarter. Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V. grew its stake in shares of DocuSign by 7.1% during the third quarter. Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V. now owns 1,296,517 shares of the company’s stock worth $80,501,000 after acquiring an additional 85,987 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Carrera Capital Advisors acquired a new position in shares of DocuSign during the third quarter valued at about $666,000. 77.64% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors. Wall Street Analysts Forecast Growth A number of equities analysts recently issued reports on DOCU shares. JMP Securities raised their target price on DocuSign from $108.00 to $124.00 and gave the stock a “market outperform” rating in a research note on Friday. Wells Fargo & Company increased their price target on shares of DocuSign from $50.00 to $70.00 and gave the stock an “underweight” rating in a report on Friday. Citigroup lifted their price objective on shares of DocuSign from $87.00 to $113.00 and gave the company a “buy” rating in a research note on Friday. HSBC reiterated a “reduce” rating on shares of DocuSign in a research note on Friday. Finally, Bank of America boosted their target price on shares of DocuSign from $60.00 to $68.00 and gave the company a “neutral” rating in a research report on Friday, September 6th. Three research analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, seven have issued a hold rating and three have assigned a buy rating to the company’s stock. According to data from MarketBeat.com, DocuSign has an average rating of “Hold” and an average target price of $92.45. Insider Buying and Selling In related news, CEO Allan C. Thygesen sold 7,763 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction dated Monday, December 2nd. The stock was sold at an average price of $80.54, for a total transaction of $625,232.02. Following the sale, the chief executive officer now directly owns 100,062 shares in the company, valued at approximately $8,058,993.48. This trade represents a 7.20 % decrease in their position. The sale was disclosed in a filing with the SEC, which can be accessed through this link . Also, CFO Blake Jeffrey Grayson sold 9,552 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction on Tuesday, October 15th. The shares were sold at an average price of $68.80, for a total transaction of $657,177.60. Following the completion of the transaction, the chief financial officer now owns 78,265 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $5,384,632. This trade represents a 10.88 % decrease in their ownership of the stock. The disclosure for this sale can be found here . In the last quarter, insiders sold 69,596 shares of company stock valued at $4,441,529. 1.66% of the stock is currently owned by corporate insiders. DocuSign Trading Up 27.9 % NASDAQ:DOCU opened at $106.99 on Friday. The firm has a market cap of $21.72 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 22.06, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 8.70 and a beta of 0.92. The company’s 50-day moving average is $74.66 and its two-hundred day moving average is $62.01. DocuSign, Inc. has a 12-month low of $44.34 and a 12-month high of $107.86. DocuSign ( NASDAQ:DOCU – Get Free Report ) last posted its quarterly earnings results on Thursday, September 5th. The company reported $0.97 EPS for the quarter, beating the consensus estimate of $0.80 by $0.17. DocuSign had a return on equity of 16.18% and a net margin of 34.56%. The company had revenue of $736.03 million during the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $727.20 million. During the same quarter in the previous year, the business earned $0.09 EPS. The firm’s revenue was up 7.0% on a year-over-year basis. On average, equities research analysts forecast that DocuSign, Inc. will post 1.03 earnings per share for the current fiscal year. DocuSign Company Profile ( Free Report ) DocuSign, Inc provides electronic signature solution in the United States and internationally. The company provides e-signature solution that enables sending and signing of agreements on various devices; Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM), which automates workflows across the entire agreement process; Document Generation streamlines the process of generating new, custom agreements; and Gen for Salesforce, which allows sales representatives to automatically generate agreements with a few clicks from within Salesforce. Featured Articles Want to see what other hedge funds are holding DOCU? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for DocuSign, Inc. ( NASDAQ:DOCU – Free Report ). Receive News & Ratings for DocuSign Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for DocuSign and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .

Boise State edges SDSU men in Cayman Islands Classic semifinalsArticle content The provincial government plans to invest up to $50 million to fund an open-access drilling test site to allow companies to develop new drilling techniques. Environment Minister Rebecca Schulz said Canada currently does not have an open-access test site and the Alberta Drilling Accelerator could spur innovative drilling technologies to support development in the geothermal, lithium, oil, and natural gas industries. “This accelerator will be open to companies big and small, driving breakthroughs in geothermal and many other sectors,” Schulz said. While the location for the test site has yet to be finalized, Premier Danielle Smith said at a Monday news conference in Leduc County, 35 km south of Edmonton, that the project will mean “big things” for oil and gas exploration in the province and will be vital in achieving carbon neutrality by 2050. “What we’re doing here today is setting the stage for innovation and prosperity far into the future,” Smith said. “By providing a test site for new drilling techniques, we’ll be expanding our already vast knowledge base and keeping Alberta out in front as a preferred global energy provider, but supporting the development of technology the world desperately needs to support its sustainability goals.” Last April, the Alberta government invested $750,000 towards a feasibility study on the project conducted by Eavor Technologies and the Canadian Association of Energy Contractors and Geothermal Energy Association. The study found that creating an industry-led accelerator would be both economically and environmentally viable. Jeanine Vany, executive vice-president of corporate affairs at Eavor Technologies, said sites have not been finalized but the area currently being considered is small and the location will be announced in 2025. “We are going to be near high road corridors and supply hubs, which is very important, and international airports, so a very central location in a very geologically robust area,” Vany said. “The industry’s vision is that this is just the beginning, and we really hope that it can be active for a long period of time.” ‘There’s no clear plan’: NDP Alberta NDP energy and minerals critic Nagwan Al-Guneid said supporting geothermal energy is a welcome announcement but added she is unclear about how the province plans to reach its carbon neutrality by 2050 goal. “What I’m hearing from the industry is that they’re unable to invest in clean energy in Alberta,” Al-Guneid said. “There are no targets. There’s no clear plan. We have a so-called climate plan in Alberta, but there is no funding, there’s no implementation plan for it. So I’m not too sure how the province plans to achieve any target if it doesn’t have an actual plan.” The project will be funded through a public-private partnership model with the $50 million being invested from the Technology Innovation and Emissions Reduction (TIER) program. The province said the Alberta Drilling Accelerator could potentially start drilling in 2026 or earlier. Smith told reporters an announcement will be coming in the next week on how the province plans to make good on its promise to fight the federal government’s emissions cap regulations. ctran@postmedia.com X: @kccindytran Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don’t miss the news you need to know — add EdmontonJournal.com and EdmontonSun.com to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters here. You can also support our journalism by becoming a digital subscriber. Subscribers gain unlimited access to The Edmonton Journal, Edmonton Sun, National Post and 13 other Canadian news sites. Support us by subscribing today: The Edmonton Journal | The Edmonton Sun.VIDEO: Silvertips down Vancover Giants