Caprock Group LLC lowered its stake in Fortive Co. ( NYSE:FTV – Free Report ) by 11.3% in the third quarter, according to its most recent Form 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The fund owned 7,504 shares of the technology company’s stock after selling 954 shares during the quarter. Caprock Group LLC’s holdings in Fortive were worth $592,000 as of its most recent SEC filing. Other hedge funds also recently made changes to their positions in the company. Private Advisor Group LLC lifted its stake in Fortive by 3.6% in the 3rd quarter. Private Advisor Group LLC now owns 3,899 shares of the technology company’s stock valued at $308,000 after purchasing an additional 135 shares during the last quarter. RDA Financial Network boosted its holdings in shares of Fortive by 3.4% during the 2nd quarter. RDA Financial Network now owns 4,191 shares of the technology company’s stock valued at $311,000 after acquiring an additional 138 shares in the last quarter. QRG Capital Management Inc. grew its position in Fortive by 0.8% during the 2nd quarter. QRG Capital Management Inc. now owns 18,507 shares of the technology company’s stock worth $1,371,000 after acquiring an additional 146 shares during the last quarter. Andina Capital Management LLC increased its holdings in Fortive by 3.4% in the 2nd quarter. Andina Capital Management LLC now owns 4,433 shares of the technology company’s stock worth $328,000 after purchasing an additional 147 shares in the last quarter. Finally, Axiom Advisory LLC raised its position in Fortive by 1.6% in the third quarter. Axiom Advisory LLC now owns 10,048 shares of the technology company’s stock valued at $734,000 after purchasing an additional 157 shares during the last quarter. 94.94% of the stock is currently owned by institutional investors and hedge funds. Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades Several analysts have recently weighed in on FTV shares. Barclays reduced their price target on Fortive from $98.00 to $95.00 and set an “overweight” rating on the stock in a report on Thursday, October 31st. Argus reaffirmed a “hold” rating on shares of Fortive in a research note on Monday, November 18th. Wolfe Research cut shares of Fortive from an “outperform” rating to a “peer perform” rating in a research note on Friday, September 6th. Mizuho upgraded Fortive from a “neutral” rating to an “outperform” rating and increased their price objective for the company from $80.00 to $90.00 in a report on Friday, September 6th. Finally, StockNews.com raised Fortive from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a report on Friday, September 13th. Six investment analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and nine have issued a buy rating to the company’s stock. According to data from MarketBeat.com, Fortive presently has a consensus rating of “Moderate Buy” and an average price target of $87.82. Fortive Stock Performance Shares of FTV stock opened at $78.42 on Friday. The firm has a 50 day moving average of $75.85 and a 200-day moving average of $74.18. The company has a market cap of $27.21 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 31.24, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 2.05 and a beta of 1.13. The company has a quick ratio of 0.99, a current ratio of 1.25 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.33. Fortive Co. has a 52 week low of $66.15 and a 52 week high of $87.10. Fortive ( NYSE:FTV – Get Free Report ) last posted its quarterly earnings results on Wednesday, October 30th. The technology company reported $0.97 EPS for the quarter, topping analysts’ consensus estimates of $0.93 by $0.04. Fortive had a net margin of 14.35% and a return on equity of 12.56%. The business had revenue of $1.53 billion during the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $1.55 billion. During the same period last year, the company posted $0.85 earnings per share. The business’s quarterly revenue was up 2.7% on a year-over-year basis. On average, equities analysts forecast that Fortive Co. will post 3.85 earnings per share for the current year. Fortive Dividend Announcement The company also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Friday, December 27th. Investors of record on Friday, November 29th will be paid a dividend of $0.08 per share. This represents a $0.32 dividend on an annualized basis and a yield of 0.41%. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Friday, November 29th. Fortive’s dividend payout ratio (DPR) is currently 12.75%. Insiders Place Their Bets In other Fortive news, CFO Charles E. Mclaughlin sold 6,864 shares of Fortive stock in a transaction that occurred on Friday, September 13th. The shares were sold at an average price of $74.03, for a total transaction of $508,141.92. Following the transaction, the chief financial officer now owns 73,391 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $5,433,135.73. This trade represents a 8.55 % decrease in their position. The transaction was disclosed in a filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available through the SEC website . Also, SVP Jonathan L. Schwarz sold 14,223 shares of the company’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Friday, September 13th. The shares were sold at an average price of $73.80, for a total value of $1,049,657.40. Following the completion of the transaction, the senior vice president now directly owns 68,161 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $5,030,281.80. This represents a 17.26 % decrease in their ownership of the stock. The disclosure for this sale can be found here . Over the last quarter, insiders have sold 197,895 shares of company stock worth $14,261,051. Corporate insiders own 1.01% of the company’s stock. Fortive Company Profile ( Free Report ) Fortive Corporation designs, develops, manufactures, and services professional and engineered products, software, and services in the United States, China, and internationally. It operates in three segments: Intelligent Operating Solutions, Precision Technologies, and Advanced Healthcare Solutions. The Intelligent Operating Solutions segment provides advanced instrumentation, software, and services, including electrical test and measurement, facility and asset lifecycle software applications, and connected worker safety and compliance solutions for manufacturing, process industries, healthcare, utilities and power, communications and electronics, and other industries. Recommended Stories Want to see what other hedge funds are holding FTV? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Fortive Co. ( NYSE:FTV – Free Report ). Receive News & Ratings for Fortive Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Fortive and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .Last week, we celebrated ChatGPT’s second birthday with a review of how it can be used in commercial real estate . Today, I’d like to zero in on some specific tools that we are using in the trade to make the day-to-day easier and more efficient. For industrial real estate, AI tools are tailored to address the challenges and opportunities in logistics, warehousing, manufacturing and distribution. Here’s a breakdown of recommended tools specifically for the industrial real estate sector: CoStar/LoopNet: Industry-standard platforms offering market analytics, property listings, and comparable data for industrial real estate. Reonomy: Uses AI to analyze industrial property data, including ownership records, zoning, and historical trends, helping identify off-market opportunities. Crexi PRO: Provides industrial market insights, listing exposure, and data analytics to identify emerging opportunities. Placer.ai: Analyzes foot traffic, demographic patterns, and market shifts, helping assess industrial site viability based on logistics trends. Orbital Insight: Uses satellite imagery and AI to track industrial activity such as construction progress, inventory levels, or logistics hub demand. Yardi Breeze: Tailored for industrial property management, offering lease tracking, expense monitoring, and automated workflows. Building Engines: Provides tools to streamline maintenance requests, tenant communications, and operational efficiency for industrial portfolios. Prologis Essentials Marketplace: Offers asset management solutions specific to industrial spaces, such as energy monitoring and warehouse optimization. JDA Software (Blue Yonder): Uses AI for supply chain management, optimizing warehouse operations and logistics hubs. Flexe: Facilitates on-demand warehouse solutions, using AI to match available industrial space with logistics needs. FourKites: Real-time AI-powered tracking and visibility for freight and supply chain logistics, crucial for industrial occupiers. VTS Rise: Integrates industrial property leasing workflows with AI-driven insights, including tenant demand and market trends. Argus Enterprise: Advanced modeling and valuation for industrial real estate portfolios, including lease comparisons and pro forma analyses. EliseAI: Automates tenant communications, lease renewals, and occupancy tracking, enhancing tenant relationships in industrial spaces. Basking.io: Monitors warehouse occupancy and operational patterns, helping optimize space usage and reduce costs. Matterport for Industrial: Creates immersive 3D virtual tours of warehouses and manufacturing facilities, enhancing marketing efforts and reducing time spent on physical site visits. Brokermint: Provides industrial property marketing tools, including proposal generation and automated deal tracking. DroneDeploy: Integrates drones with AI to inspect industrial properties, track construction progress, and map large industrial sites. Skycatch: Provides high-resolution site imaging and 3D modeling for industrial property evaluation and planning. Each of these tools addresses specific aspects of industrial real estate, from acquisition and management to logistics and sustainability. By incorporating these technologies, you can streamline operations, improve decision-making, and enhance client service in this specialized sector. Allen C. Buchanan, SIOR, is a principal with Lee & Associates Commercial Real Estate Services in Orange. He can be reached at abuchanan@lee-associates.com or 714.564.7104. His website is allencbuchanan.blogspot.com .

Morgan Rogers looked to have given Unai Emery’s side another famous win when he slammed a loose ball home at the death, but referee Jesus Gil Manzano ruled Diego Carlos to have fouled Juve goalkeeper Michele Di Gregorio and the goal was chalked off. It was a disappointment for Villa, who remain unbeaten at home in their debut Champions League campaign and are still in contention to qualify automatically for the last 16. A very controversial finish at Villa Park 😲 Morgan Rogers' late goal is ruled out for a foul on Juventus goalkeeper Michele Di Gregorio and the match ends 0-0 ❌ 📺 & — Football on TNT Sports (@footballontnt) Emiliano Martinez had earlier displayed why he was named the best goalkeeper in the world as his wonder save kept his side level in the second half. The Argentina international paraded his two Yashin Trophies on the pitch before kick-off at Villa Park and then showed why he won back-to-back FIFA awards when he denied Francisco Conceicao. Before Rogers’ moment of drama in the fourth minute of added time, the closest Villa came to scoring was in the first half when Lucas Digne’s free-kick hit the crossbar. But a draw was a fair result which leaves Villa out of the top eight on goal difference and Juventus down in 19th. Before the game Emery called Juventus one of the “best teams in the world, historically and now”, but this was an Italian side down to the bare bones. Only 14 outfield players made the trip from Turin, with striker Dusan Vlahovic among those who stayed behind. The opening 30 minutes were forgettable before the game opened up. Ollie Watkins, still chasing his first Champions League goal, had Villa’s first presentable chance as he lashed an effort straight at Di Gregorio. Matty Cash then had a vicious effort from the resulting corner which was blocked by Federico Gatti and started a counter-attack which ended in Juventus striker Timothy Weah. Villa came closest to breaking the deadlock at the end of the first half when Digne’s 20-yard free-kick clipped the top of the crossbar and went over. Martinez then produced his brilliant save just after the hour. A corner made its way through to the far post where Conceicao was primed to head in at the far post, but Martinez sprawled himself across goal to scoop the ball away. How has he kept that one out?! 🤯 Emi Martinez with an INCREDIBLE save to keep it goalless at Villa Park ⛔️ 📺 & — Football on TNT Sports (@footballontnt) Replays showed most of the ball went over the line, but the Argentinian got there with millimetres to spare. At the other end another fine goal-line block denied John McGinn as Manuel Locatelli got his foot in the way with Di Gregorio beaten. The game looked to be petering out until a last-gasp free-kick saw Rogers slam home, but whistle-happy official Gil Manzano halted the celebrations by ruling the goal out.

The Los Angeles Lakers are off to a hot 10-5 start and look like they have the pieces in place to sustain success throughout the regular season. But like with all teams looking to make a win-now push, there’s always room to grow. One of the motifs of the LeBron James- Anthony Davis Lakers has been trying to truly identify who the third scorer is. Since winning the title in 2020, however, they have failed to concretely identify a true third offensive option. Some nights it’s D’Angelo Russell; Austin Reaves; Rui Hachimura; and Dalton Khecht. Should Los Angeles Lakers Pursue Cam Thomas? FanSided’s Michael Saenz recently threw out the idea of the Lakers targeting Brooklyn Nets guard Cam Thomas to add to their offensive portfolio. Thomas would be a stark upgrade in offensive explosiveness from Russell if he were to replace him as a starter. If he were to do the same with Knecht, it would take pressure off of him and allow him to develop at his own pace instead of becoming an offensive leader as a rookie. Also Read: Dalton Knecht Was A Strategic Pick For The Los Angeles Lakers Thomas is also known to score in spurts and could be an exciting option to come off the bench to shoot in bunches. He would be able to supplement Gabe Vincent and Max Christie, who have both been underwhelming in the box scores through 15 games. Thomas, 6’3′′ in his fourth season out of LSU, is averaging 24.4 points per game shooting 38.5% from three on the year. This article first appeared on LAFB Network and was syndicated with permission.

UAE leaders pardon over 5,500 prisoners ahead of Eid Al Etihad

Top 10 Cities to Age in Place in the United States for 2024China set to narrow digital divide

Why Is Deere (DE) Stock Soaring TodayHelping to drown out the noise

PHILADELPHIA (AP) — Penn State has won a closely watched trademark fight over an online retailer's use of its vintage sports logos and images. A Pennsylvania jury awarded Penn State $28,000 in damages on Wednesday over products made and sold by Vintage Brand and Sportswear Inc., two firms co-founded by former minor league baseball player Chad Hartvigson. Penn State accused them of selling “counterfeit” clothing and accessories, while the defendants said their website makes clear they are not affiliated with the university. At least a dozen other schools have sued the defendants on similar grounds, including Purdue, Stanford and UCLA, Penn State said in its 2021 lawsuit. However, the Penn State case was the first to go to trial and seen by some as a test case in the sports merchandising industry. “It addresses an important issue with trademark law — whether or not the mark owner is able to prevent third parties from using its marks on T-shirts and paraphernalia without permission,” said Tiffany Gehrke, a trademark lawyer in Chicago who was not involved in the case. The verdict, she said, maintains the status quo, while a victory for Vintage Brand “could have shaken things up.” It followed a six-day trial in federal court in Williamsport, Pennsylvania, overseen by Chief U.S. District Judge Matthew W. Brann. Defense lawyers declined to comment on the verdict and whether their clients planned to appeal. Penn State, in a statement, called its trademarks “critical” to the school's brand, and said it was grateful for the verdict. “The university appreciates this result as it relates to the many hundreds of licensees with whom the university works and who go through the appropriate processes to use Penn State’s trademarks," the statement said. Founded in 1855, Penn State adopted the Nittany Lion as its mascot in 1904 and has been using various images of the animal, along with the school's seal and other logos, for decades, the lawsuit said. The school now has more than 100,000 students at 24 campuses.Jones alleges fraud and collusion marred the bankruptcy auction in which The Onion was named the winning bidder on November 14 over a company affiliated with him. US bankruptcy judge Christopher Lopez had been scheduled to hear an emergency motion to disqualify The Onion’s bid, but decided to put it off until either December 9 or December 17. That is also when the judge will hear arguments on a request to approve the sale of Infowars to The Onion. Mr Lopez said similar arguments are being made in both requests. He could allow The Onion to move forward with the sale, order a new auction or name the other bidder as the winner. At stake is whether Mr Jones gets to stay at Infowars’ studio in Austin, Texas, under a new owner friendly to him, or whether he gets kicked out by The Onion. The other bidder, First United American Companies, runs a website in Mr Jones’s name that sells nutritional supplements. Regardless, Mr Jones has set up a new studio, websites and social media accounts that would allow him to keep airing his show. His personal account with 3.3 million followers on the social platform X was not part of the sale, although Mr Lopez will be deciding whether it should be included in the liquidation and sold off later. In a new court filing on Monday, lawyers for X objected to any sale of the accounts of both Mr Jones and Infowars, saying X is the owner of the accounts and that it has not given consent for them to be sold or transferred. Mr Jones has praised X owner Elon Musk on his show and suggested that Mr Musk should buy Infowars. Mr Musk has not responded publicly to that suggestion and was not among the bidders. Mr Jones’ bankruptcy and the liquidation of his assets came about after he was ordered to pay nearly 1.5 billion dollars (£1.19 billion) to relatives of victims of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Connecticut. Mr Jones was found liable for defamation and emotional distress damages in lawsuits in Connecticut and Texas for repeatedly calling the 2012 shooting that killed 20 first graders and six educators a hoax staged by actors to increase gun control. Proceeds from the liquidation are to go to Mr Jones’s creditors, including the Sandy Hook families who sued him. Mr Jones alleged The Onion’s bid was the result of fraud and collusion involving many of those families, the humour site and a court-appointed trustee who is overseeing the liquidation. First United American Companies submitted a 3.5 million dollar (£2.7 million) sealed bid, while The Onion offered 1.75 million dollars (£1.3 million) in cash. But The Onion’s bid also included a pledge by Sandy Hook families to forego some or all of the auction proceeds due to them giving other creditors a total of 100,000 dollars (£79,400) more than they would receive under other bids. The trustee, Christopher Murray, said that made The Onion’s proposal better for creditors and he named it the winning bid. He has denied any wrongdoing. Mr Jones and First United American Companies claimed that the bid violated Mr Lopez’s rules for the auction by including multiple entities and lacking a valid dollar amount. Mr Jones also alleged Mr Murray improperly cancelled an expected round of live bidding and only selected among the sealed bids that were submitted. Mr Jones called the auction “rigged” and a “fraud” on his show, which airs on the Infowars website, radio stations and his X account. In a court filing, Mr Murray called the allegations “a disappointed bidder’s improper attempt to influence an otherwise fair and open auction process”. Mr Lopez’s September order on the auction procedures made a live bidding round optional. It gave broad authority to Mr Murray to conduct the sale, including the power to reject any bid, no matter how high, that was “contrary to the best interests” of Mr Jones, his company and their creditors. Hi friends! I wanted to give a quick update on The Onion’s purchase of InfoWars, which we can’t wait to relaunch as the dumbest site on the internet. Long and short of it: We won the bid and — you're not going to believe it — the previous InfoWars folks aren't taking it well. — follow @bencollins on bluesky (@oneunderscore__) November 16, 2024 But at a November 14 hearing, Mr Lopez said he was concerned about the process and transparency. “We’re all going to an evidentiary hearing and I’m going to figure out exactly what happened,” he said. “No one should feel comfortable with the results of this auction.” The assets of Infowars’ parent company, Free Speech Systems, that were up for sale included the Austin studio, Infowars’ video archive, video production equipment, product trademarks, and Infowars’ websites and social media accounts. Mr Jones is appealing the 1.5 billion dollar (£1.19 billion) in judgments citing free speech rights but has acknowledged that the school shooting happened. Mr Jones has brought in millions of dollars a year in revenue by hawking nutritional supplements, clothing, survival gear and other merchandise from his Infowars Store website, according to court documents. Many of Mr Jones’ personal assets, including real estate as well as guns and other personal belongings, also are being sold as part of the bankruptcy.

None

Penn State wins trademark case over retailer's use of vintage logos, images